Or so they claim.
But in news just to hand, it appears that all these so-called "editors" are actually engaged in a systematic attempt to undermine civilisation as we know it!
So who are these "editors", exactly?
Masquerading as slightly obsessed and order-loving hobbyists, they meet in darkened forums and pass secret messages to each other using codenames and an indecipherable language, including arcane words such as "catmv", "reorg", "keditall" and "meta". This last term used to carry all sorts of fearful connotations, calling up images of big sticks, slashed permissions, and super-secret cabals.
But bureaucracy has extended its grip even into the subterranean caverns of DMOZ, and metas are now no more awesome than the average middle manager. Instead, a new overclass has emerged in recent years ... the all-seeing, all-knowing, all-powerful Admin, although for reasons which are poorly understood, they seem to have some sort of inbuilt regulatory system which continuously limits their numbers, regardless of new additions.
Oh yes, it does, because lots of people say it does, and they wouldn't lie, would they?
Besides, you can read it all over the internet, which is further proof that it must be true!
For a start, there are strict guidelines about editorial Conflict of Interest, and any volunteer found to be requesting or accepting payment will instantly and permanently lose their account. One bribe, and you're out. No second chances.
According to these "reliable sources", most editors are getting paid by webmasters who are understandably anxious to have their sites included in this prestigious directory, even though the DMOZ Social Contract promises that there will never be any charge.
All these corrupt editors are apparently making an absolute fortune by selling something which is actually free, and what's more they are managing to do it without ever being caught!
Hundreds and hundreds of them!
For years and years!
Hang on, that doesn't sound possible!
Well no, you are quite right. Of course it's not possible.
Well no, you are quite right. Of course it's not possible.
Secondly, any webmaster who tries to bribe an editor risks having all his sites permanently banned from listing in the directory - hardly worth the risk of even trying to pay for something which is already free.
Thirdly, there is a prominent link on every DMOZ category page called "Report Abuse", so that anyone can report any breach of the ODP policies and guidelines (with the necessary evidence, of course). Needless to say, the people so stridently claiming abuse never have enough evidence to submit such a report.
Fourthly, many of the more experienced editors have excellent detective skills and a passion for finding the occasional "bad egg" that inevitably shows up in a large community.
And finally, it is clear that some of the more hysterical and slanderous claims made about widespread DMOZ corruption come from the following groups:
- former editors who have previously lost their own accounts due to abusing their positions
- webmasters who have tried and failed to bribe an editor, and who are therefore bitterly disappointed
- owners of websites which do not meet the criteria for listing and therefore blame DMOZ for having high standards.
A credible bunch, to be sure. They probably have some unclaimed lottery winnings they'd like to discuss with you too.
ADDED in March 2011: Before you click the Comment button, please read this post. Thank you.
